[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8DBDDB.5080402@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:19:23 -0400
From: William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add minimal support for software performance counters
for ia64
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:04 -0400, William Cohen wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:04 -0400, William Cohen wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef __ia64__
>>>> +#include "../../arch/ia64/include/asm/unistd.h"
>>>> +#define rmb() asm volatile("" ::: "memory")
>>>> +#define cpu_relax() asm volatile("" ::: "memory");
>>>> +#endif
>>> Surely the itanic has a real memory barrier? The kernel seems to use
>>> something along the lines of mf.
>>>
>>> Also, cpu_relax() seems to end up being asm volatile("hint @pause" :::
>>> "memory"), although we don't seem to have an actual user of cpu_relax()
>>> in perf atm.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Peter, thanks for the comment. I took a look at the rmb() and cpu_relax() code
>> in the kernel and revised the patch with the appropriate defines
>
> Looks good now, thanks!
>
When looking through the patch today I realized the new perf_counter.h was
placed in include/asm-ia64. It should be placed in
arch/ia64/include/asm/perf_counter.h.
-Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists