[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090820141400.f6d3d5a6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:14:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: bblum@...rew.cmu.edu, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Use vmalloc for large cgroups pidlist allocations
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:58:27 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> From: Ben Blum <bblum@...gle.com>
>
>
> Use vmalloc for large cgroups pidlist allocations
>
> Separates all pidlist allocation requests to a separate function that judges
> based on the requested size whether or not the array needs to be vmalloced or
> can be gotten via kmalloc, and similar for kfree/vfree.
>
Hang on. Isn't this why Dave just wrote and I just rush-merged
lib/flex_array.c?
Was that code evaluated for this application and judged unsuitable? If so,
for what reason?
If not, can someone please do this?
Ta.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists