[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8DC857.7060002@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:04:07 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
CC: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add /proc/cpuinfo/physical id quirks
On 08/20/2009 02:59 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
>
> Once you go down this path of thinking though, ACPI starts
> looming, and that has other issues associated with it (in my
> mind, mostly around the cleanliness of implementation as ACPI
> starts poking its fingers everywhere).
>
Seems more like DMI than ACPI to me, but this kind of stuff is already
creeping into everything no matter what.
*However* the whole point of this is to not muck with data structures
that the kernel actually cares about in any way, and have a separate
field which is only for human consumption.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists