linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: add /proc/cpuinfo/physical id quirks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:04:07 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
CC:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add /proc/cpuinfo/physical id quirks

On 08/20/2009 02:59 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> 
> Once you go down this path of thinking though, ACPI starts
> looming, and that has other issues associated with it (in my
> mind, mostly around the cleanliness of implementation as ACPI
> starts poking its fingers everywhere).
> 

Seems more like DMI than ACPI to me, but this kind of stuff is already
creeping into everything no matter what.

*However* the whole point of this is to not muck with data structures
that the kernel actually cares about in any way, and have a separate
field which is only for human consumption.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/