[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090821003232.GD29994@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:32:32 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add /proc/cpuinfo/physical id quirks
> I agree... if this ID is used for topology detection, we shouldn't
> replace it arbitrarily with information from BIOS just to hope that it
> matches the motherboard stencil. *Furthermore*, there is no reason why
> motherboard stencilAs are purely numeric... consider the rather obvious
> case of two rows of four CPUs; they may have CPU slots labelled A1, A2,
> A3, A4, B1, B2, B3, B4. It might very well be the right thing to
> support arbitrary strings for platforms we recognize.
Maintaining a manual mapping to strings in the kernel to such strings
would be just crazy. You would need a new entry for basically
every system.
The reason to correct SOCKETID is that it it is output on errors.
If it is numerical and you know it's wrong you can correct it,
and then you can identify the right CPU. Otherwise you lose.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists