[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090820051038.GF21100@kryten>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:10:38 +1000
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
balajirrao@...il.com, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter
batch values for stats counters
Hi,
Looks like this issue is still present. I tested on a 32 core box and
the patch improved maximum context switch rate from from 76k/sec to 9.5M/sec.
Thats over 100x faster, or 50x per line of code. That's got to be some sort of
record :)
Any chance we can get a fix in for 2.6.31? Don't make me find an even bigger
box so I can break the 200x mark :)
Anton
> --
>
> When CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is enabled we can call cpuacct_update_stats
> with values much larger than percpu_counter_batch. This means the
> call to percpu_counter_add will always add to the global count which is
> protected by a spinlock.
>
> Since reading of the CPU accounting cgroup counters is not performance
> critical, we can use a maximum size batch of INT_MAX and use
> percpu_counter_sum on the read side which will add all the percpu
> counters.
>
> With this patch an 8 core POWER6 with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and
> CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT shows an improvement in aggregate context switch rate of
> 397k/sec to 3.9M/sec, a 10x improvement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
> ---
>
> Index: linux.trees.git/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.trees.git.orig/kernel/sched.c 2009-07-16 10:11:02.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux.trees.git/kernel/sched.c 2009-07-16 10:16:41.000000000 +1000
> @@ -10551,7 +10551,7 @@
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> - s64 val = percpu_counter_read(&ca->cpustat[i]);
> + s64 val = percpu_counter_sum(&ca->cpustat[i]);
> val = cputime64_to_clock_t(val);
> cb->fill(cb, cpuacct_stat_desc[i], val);
> }
> @@ -10621,7 +10621,7 @@
> ca = task_ca(tsk);
>
> do {
> - percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
> + __percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, INT_MAX);
> ca = ca->parent;
> } while (ca);
> rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists