linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generic sysfs support for ACPI ALS and other ALS devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:51:00 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generic sysfs support for ACPI ALS and other ALS
	devices

Hi!

> > > Could you please look at the documentation about ALS sysfs class in the
> > > patch I sent out just now, and comment on that one please? thanks!
> > 
> > I did. The interface is too ugly to live.
> 
> Hi, Pavel,
> 
> I tried to convert the ALS sysfs I/F to two attributes only, i.e.
> illuminance and adjustment.
> But I found several potential problems.
> 1. the illuminance to display adjustment mappings can not be convert to
> a brightness level smoothly.
> for example,
> 	illuminance	adjustment
> 1	600		70
> 2	900		100
> 3	1500		120
> when the current illuminance is not one of the values listed in the
> mappings, e.g. 750, the ALS driver don't have enough knowledge to get
> the proper display adjustment, especially that a proper display
> adjustment would be easy to select a proper brightness level.
> We'd better leave this to user space, which is more flexible.

Well, what interpolation does ACPI specs suggest to do? Maybe it is
easier to have linear interpolation in the kernel than to have ugly
20-file interface?

> 2. I don't know if there will be laptops exporting buggy mappings that
> needs to be overridden some day, but the current sysfs I/F is easy for
> expanding.
> what do you think?

If you have buggy laptop, fix the laptop. (You can still export the
raw values... and btw if you have buggy laptop and want to work around
it, maybe the workaround is easier/better done in kernel?)

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/