linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.32-rc6 BUG at mm/slab.c:2869!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090821020633.GA25571@hash.localnet>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:06:33 -0400
From:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc6 BUG at mm/slab.c:2869!

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:02:49PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > I'll try that and kmemcheck next.
> 
> Hm, I'm afraid kmemcheck gives some known false positives related to
> bitfields in ext4 code, so in the case that something turned up, it
> might be hard to distinguish it from those false positives.

Well I didn't get anything from ext4 so far.  I did hit one with
fsnotify:

WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from freed memory (f34a443c)
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee008a06f700011000
 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a f f f f f f f f
                                                         ^

Pid: 2745, comm: fsck.ext4 Not tainted (2.6.31-rc6 #2) MacBook1,1
EIP: 0060:[<c10f3656>] EFLAGS: 00010217 CPU: 0
EIP is at inotify_handle_event+0x76/0xc0
EAX: f34a443c EBX: f34a4438 ECX: 00000000 EDX: f6732000
ESI: f6559764 EDI: 00000000 EBP: f6733f0c ESP: c1527450
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: f6c046d4 CR3: 367fb000 CR4: 000026d0
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: ffff4ff0 DR7: 00000400
 [<c10f0d78>] fsnotify+0xa8/0x130
 [<c10c5e11>] __fput+0xb1/0x1e0
 [<c10c5f55>] fput+0x15/0x20
 [<c10c2ca7>] filp_close+0x47/0x80
 [<c10c2d54>] sys_close+0x74/0xc0
 [<c1002ec8>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
 [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

I think that is list_empty() here where %eax is list_head
and event_list->next is the read location... which definitely
doesn't look like a pointer, if I'm reading it correctly.

inotify_fsnotify.o:

        /* did event_priv get attached? */
        if (list_empty(&fsn_event_priv->event_list))
 143:   8d 43 04                lea    0x4(%ebx),%eax

        event_priv = kmem_cache_alloc(event_priv_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (unlikely(!event_priv))
                return -ENOMEM;

        fsn_event_priv = &event_priv->fsnotify_event_priv_data;
 146:   39 43 04                cmp    %eax,0x4(%ebx)     <=== read here
 149:   74 1d                   je     168 <inotify_handle_event+0x98>

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/