[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8F1FEA.1060706@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:30:02 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alok N Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 16/32] x86: Replace ARCH_SETUP by a proper platform
function
On 08/21/09 14:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> ARCH_SETUP is a horrible hack of paravirt/xen which is way nicer to
> read as a platform setup function.
>
Not really correct; its a left-over from the old subarch stuff. But it
was certainly never very pretty.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists