[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908220034110.1769@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:36:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alok N Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 02/32] x86: Add probe_roms to platform_setup
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/21/09 14:29, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> [argh attachments]
No. :)
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename=x86-add-probe-roms-to-platform-setup.patch
> > probe_roms is only used on 32bit. Add it to the platform_setup code
> > and remove the #ifdefs.
> >
> > Default initializer is platform_setup_noop() which is overridden in
> > the 32bit boot code.
> >
> >
>
> I realize you're aiming to make this transform have no functional
> side-effects, but is there a good reason why probe_roms *couldn't* be
> done in 64-bit? It seems to me that its useful for coverage
> completeness to have the 32 and 64 bit do the same thing even if its
> sometimes redundant.
Yes. I aimed for functional equivilance in the first place and this is
a RFC so any improvements are welcome.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists