[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824085331.GB475@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:53:31 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix race copy_process() vs de_thread()
On 08/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 08/24, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> >
> > The point is that de_thread() waits until other thread calls wake_up_process().
> > In __exit_signal() when sig->count == 2, the thread calls wake_up_process(),
> > and then de_thread() will continue. However if another thread is during
> > copy_process(), the sig->count is incremented at copy_signal(). That makes
> > no wake_up_process().
>
> Yes. Imho signal->count must die. But I never had time to kill it.
>
> It is not needed. For example, __exit_signal() can just check
> thread_group_leader() instead of atomic_dec_and_test(sig->count).
>
> As for this bug, I'd like to think a bit more. But how about the
> patch below? With this patch
>
> - copy_process() increments signal/live only when we know
> we start the new thread
>
> - if copy_process() fails, we just check CLONE_THREAD.
> If true - do nothing, the counters were not changed.
> If false - just release ->signal, counters must be 1.
Or we can do a bit smaller patch. But in any case, copy_process()
must not use sig->count as a refcounter.
And of course, it would be nice to avoid playing ->notify_count
games in copy_process() pathes.
Oleg
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -816,7 +816,6 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clo
struct signal_struct *sig;
if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) {
- atomic_inc(¤t->signal->count);
atomic_inc(¤t->signal->live);
return 0;
}
@@ -881,9 +880,7 @@ static void cleanup_signal(struct task_s
{
struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
- atomic_dec(&sig->live);
-
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sig->count))
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sig->live))
__cleanup_signal(sig);
}
@@ -1239,6 +1236,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
}
if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) {
+ atomic_inc(¤t->signal->count);
p->group_leader = current->group_leader;
list_add_tail_rcu(&p->thread_group, &p->group_leader->thread_group);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists