[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A93129E.6080704@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:22:22 -0600
From: Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
possible
Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Degraded MD RAID5 does not work by design; whole stripe will be
>> damaged on powerfail or reset or kernel bug, and ext3 can not cope
>> with that kind of damage. [I don't see why statistics should be
>> neccessary for that; the same way we don't need statistics to see that
>> ext2 needs fsck after powerfail.]
>> Pavel
>>
> What you are describing is a double failure and RAID5 is not double
> failure tolerant regardless of the file system type....
Are you sure he isn't talking about how RAID must write all the data
chunks to make a complete stripe and if there is a power-loss, some of
the chunks may be written and some may not?
As I read Pavel's point he is saying that the incomplete write can be
detected by the incorrect parity chunk, but degraded RAID-5 has no
working parity chunk so the incomplete write would go undetected.
I know this is a RAID failure mode. However, I actually thought this was
a problem even for a intact RAID-5. AFAIK, RAID-5 does not generally
read the complete stripe and perform verification unless that is
requested, because doing so would hurt performance and lose the entire
point of the RAID-5 rotating parity blocks.
--
Zan Lynx
zlynx@....org
"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists