[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908241730.26356.rob@landley.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:30:24 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
On Monday 24 August 2009 09:55:53 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Probably, Pavel did too good job in generalizing things, and it could be
> better to make a doc about HDD vs SSD or HDD vs Flash-based-storage.
> Not sure. But the idea to document subtle FS assumption is good, IMO.
The standard procedure for this seems to be to cc: Jonathan Corbet on the
discussion, make puppy eyes at him, and subscribe to Linux Weekly News.
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists