[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090824225514.GA30263@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:55:15 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dm snapshot: implement .iterate_devices
On Mon, Aug 24 2009 at 5:15pm -0400,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:11:07 -0400
> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch implements .iterate_devices for the origin and snapshot
> > targets. dm-snapshot's lack of .iterate_devices resulted in the
> > inability to properly establish queue_limits for both targets.
> >
> > With 4K sector drives: an unfortunate side-effect of not establishing
> > proper limits in either targets' DM device was that IO to the devices
> > would fail even though both had been created without error.
>
> Does this make the patch a regression fix?
Yes.
> > Commit af4874e03ed82f050d5872d8c39ce64bf16b5c38 should have implemented
> > .iterate_devices for dm-snap.c's origin and snapshot targets.
>
> Please use the form af4874e03ed82f050d5872d8c39ce64bf16b5c38 ("dm
> target:s introduce iterate devices fn") when referring to commits.
> Because commits might have different IDs in different trees (I think
> that's the reason).
OK, thanks for picking this up. I believe Alasdair is back from
vacation tomorrow and will be pushing other remaining DM fixes for
2.6.31 final.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists