linux-kernel - Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090824224427.GI29763@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:44:27 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
Cc:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
	possible

On Mon 2009-08-24 16:22:22, Zan Lynx wrote:
> Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Degraded MD RAID5 does not work by design; whole stripe will be
>>> damaged on powerfail or reset or kernel bug, and ext3 can not cope
>>> with that kind of damage. [I don't see why statistics should be
>>> neccessary for that; the same way we don't need statistics to see that
>>> ext2 needs fsck after powerfail.]
>>>                                     Pavel
>>>   
>> What you are describing is a double failure and RAID5 is not double  
>> failure tolerant regardless of the file system type....
>
> Are you sure he isn't talking about how RAID must write all the data  
> chunks to make a complete stripe and if there is a power-loss, some of  
> the chunks may be written and some may not?
>
> As I read Pavel's point he is saying that the incomplete write can be  
> detected by the incorrect parity chunk, but degraded RAID-5 has no  
> working parity chunk so the incomplete write would go undetected.

Yep.

> I know this is a RAID failure mode. However, I actually thought this was  
> a problem even for a intact RAID-5. AFAIK, RAID-5 does not generally  
> read the complete stripe and perform verification unless that is  
> requested, because doing so would hurt performance and lose the entire  
> point of the RAID-5 rotating parity blocks.

Not sure; is not RAID expected to verify the array after unclean
shutdown?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/