[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202cde0e0908232314j4b90aa61pb4bcd0223ffbc087@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:14:30 +1200
From: Alexey Korolev <akorolex@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Eric Munson <linux-mm@...bm.net>,
Alexey Korolev <akorolev@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]HTLB mapping for drivers (take 2)
Mel,
> How about;
>
> o Extend Eric's helper slightly to take a GFP mask that is
> associated with the inode and used for allocations from
> outside the hugepage pool
> o A helper that returns the page at a given offset within
> a hugetlbfs file for population before the page has been
> faulted.
>
> I know this is a bit hand-wavy, but it would allow significant sharing
> of the existing code and remove much of the hugetlbfs-awareness from
> your current driver.
>
I'm trying to write the solution you have described. The question I
have is about extension of hugetlb_file_setup function.
Is it supposed to allocate memory in hugetlb_file_setup function? Or
it is supposed to have reservation only.
If reservation only, then it is necessary to keep a gfp_mask for a
file somewhere. Would it be Ok to keep a gfp_mask for a file in
file->private_data?
Thanks,
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists