linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3]HTLB mapping for drivers (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:14:30 +1200
From:	Alexey Korolev <akorolex@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Eric Munson <linux-mm@...bm.net>,
	Alexey Korolev <akorolev@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]HTLB mapping for drivers (take 2)

Mel,

> How about;
>
>        o Extend Eric's helper slightly to take a GFP mask that is
>          associated with the inode and used for allocations from
>          outside the hugepage pool
>        o A helper that returns the page at a given offset within
>          a hugetlbfs file for population before the page has been
>          faulted.
>
> I know this is a bit hand-wavy, but it would allow significant sharing
> of the existing code and remove much of the hugetlbfs-awareness from
> your current driver.
>

I'm trying to write the solution you have described. The question I
have is about extension of hugetlb_file_setup function.
Is it supposed to allocate memory in hugetlb_file_setup function? Or
it is supposed to have reservation only.
If reservation only, then it is necessary to keep a gfp_mask for a
file somewhere. Would it be Ok to keep a gfp_mask for a file in
file->private_data?

Thanks,
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/