linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] eventfd: reorganize the code to simplify new flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090827120206.GA21907@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:02:06 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@....org>
Cc:	davidel@...ilserver.org, avi@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] eventfd: reorganize the code to simplify new flags

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/20/2009 05:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> +static inline int eventfd_writeable(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, u64 n)
>> +{
>> +	return ULLONG_MAX - n>  ctx->count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void eventfd_dowrite(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, u64 ucnt)
>> +{
>> +	if (eventfd_writeable(ctx, ucnt))
>> +		ucnt = ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count;
>> +
>> +	ctx->count += ucnt;
>
> In any case, this usage of eventfd_writeable is wrong:

Fixed, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/