linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200908311723.34067.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:23:33 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
Cc:	"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"gregory.haskins@...il.com" <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server

On Monday 31 August 2009, Xin, Xiaohui wrote:
> 
> Hi, Michael
> That's a great job. We are now working on support VMDq on KVM, and since the VMDq hardware presents L2 sorting
> based on MAC addresses and VLAN tags, our target is to implement a zero copy solution using VMDq.

I'm also interested in helping there, please include me in the discussions.

> We stared
> from the virtio-net architecture. What we want to proposal is to use AIO combined with direct I/O:
> 1) Modify virtio-net Backend service in Qemu to submit aio requests composed from virtqueue.

right, that sounds useful.

> 2) Modify TUN/TAP device to support aio operations and the user space buffer directly mapping into the host kernel.
> 3) Let a TUN/TAP device binds to single rx/tx queue from the NIC.

I don't think we should do that with the tun/tap driver. By design, tun/tap is a way to interact with the
networking stack as if coming from a device. The only way this connects to an external adapter is through
a bridge or through IP routing, which means that it does not correspond to a specific NIC.

I have worked on a driver I called 'macvtap' in lack of a better name, to add a new tap frontend to
the 'macvlan' driver. Since macvlan lets you add slaves to a single NIC device, this gives you a direct
connection between one or multiple tap devices to an external NIC, which works a lot better than when
you have a bridge inbetween. There is also work underway to add a bridging capability to macvlan, so
you can communicate directly between guests like you can do with a bridge.

Michael's vhost_net can plug into the same macvlan infrastructure, so the work is complementary.

> 4) Modify the net_dev and skb structure to permit allocated skb to use user space directly mapped payload
> buffer address rather then kernel allocated.

yes.

> As zero copy is also your goal, we are interested in what's in your mind, and would like to collaborate with you if possible.
> BTW, we will send our VMDq write-up very soon.

Ok, cool.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/