[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090901140621.GB13229@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:06:21 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] writeback: move super_block argument to struct
writeback_control
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:05:11PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:55:51AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > >
> > > I just tried compiling per-bdi v15 against the latest git HEAD, and
> > > the compilation failed:
> >
> > Oops, never mind. I just realized you had already fixed this in v16.
>
> Yeah, I didn't realize we had out-of-core callers of
> generic_sync_sb_inodes(), should be alright now :-)
I just sent out a call for benchmarking/testing to the ext4 list, and
cc'ed LKML.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git test-bdi
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
This contains the v16 per-bdi patches plus the ext4 patches I plan to
push for 2.6.32.
I'm also running it through XFSQA using ext4; it's been a clean run so
far.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists