[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909022312.58494.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:12:58 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] introduce ALS sysfs class
On Tuesday 01 September 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > IMO, 0 and -1 are not errors. they just suggest that the Ambient Light
> > > > illuminance is beyond the device support range, while the device is
> > > > still working normally.
> > > > what about exporting these values (0 and -1) to user space directly?
> > >
> > > Returning 0 for "below" range and 99999999 for "above" range would be
> > > nice, yes.
> >
> > Why not 0 and "all ones" or 0 and -1.
> >
> > Is there anything wrong with -1 in particular?
>
> Normal people expect -1 to be less than 123, and output is in ascii. If
> you make it ((unsigned) ~0) I guess that becomes acceptable.
Well, "-1" is a perfectly valid alphanumerical representation of an int.
I don't really see the problem with the "-", unless we're talking about some
broken user space, that is.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists