[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251990699.6521.12.camel@mj>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:11:39 -0400
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>,
List Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Get rid of duplicate usb id from rt2500usb
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:18 +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:55 PM, John W. Linville<linville@...driver.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >> USB_DEVICE(0x148f, 0x2573) is served by the rt73usb driver where it is already
> >> defined. Remove it from rt2500usb.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>
> >> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>
> >
> > IIRC there are IDs that are used by different devices where rt73usb
> > covers one device and the rt2500usb covers another. Are you sure
> > this is not one of those?
>
> Yes, I believe this particular ID was already discussed some time ago
> on this list. This is one of the infamous duplicate IDs. (Fortunately not
> one of those infamous Linksys devices with 5 different chipsets for the
> same ID).
The famous Linksys devices can be distinguished by the textual PCMCIA
ID. In this case, there is no reliable way to distinguish the devices
without trying the drivers. I tried and could not find any difference
between "lsusb -v" output for the devices said to be supported by
rt2500usb and rt73usb.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists