linux-kernel - Re: [Question] x86,APIC: In apicdef.h dfr,svr,...... shouldn't be const?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b9df5fa10909031556i3d87ff72v3ce4ed8bcd4e5dd@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:56:01 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Question] x86,APIC: In apicdef.h dfr,svr,...... shouldn't be 
	const?

On 9/2/09, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
>
>  All the three have meaningful semantics on writes at least on some
>  versions of the APIC (they either have writable fields or trigger side
>  effects on writes).  It looks like your documentation is wrong (not
>  unheard of with Intel).

Thanks, Maciej. If my documentation is wrong, then which documentation
should I follow? Isn't there any well defined document?
>
>
>   Maciej
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/