[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090904174605.GA8396@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:46:05 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@...ian.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
544145@...s.debian.org, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: 32bit binaries on x86_64/Xen segfaults in syscall-vdso
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:07:39AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 09/03/09 15:36, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > This function looks weird. It tries to restores the user code segment.
> > But the documentation from AMD explicitely stat that the CS and SS are
> > restored from the STAR register.
>
> And STAR is always set with:
> wrmsrl(MSR_STAR, ((u64)__USER32_CS)<<48 | ((u64)__KERNEL_CS)<<32);
No. This is the normal kernel setup. But the Xen setup (the relevant
one) looks different:
| #define FLAT_RING3_CS32 0xe023
| wrmsr(MSR_STAR, 0, (FLAT_RING3_CS32<<16) | __HYPERVISOR_CS);
But this does not match my observation either.
And even the native Linux kernel uses "iret" to jump out of a compat
(32bit) syscall. No, I don't want to understand this, but it looks
highly broken.
Bastian
--
Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists