[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA1524F.7030404@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:45:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code.
On 09/04/2009 07:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> any 64-bit cpu that supports it can have a 32bit kernel installed on it.
>> (and a significant number of users actually do this).
>
> 1) we really should be pushing those people to run 64bit kernels
>
> [ I'm still hoping distros will start shipping 64bit kernels and have
> the bootloader pick the 64bit one when the hardware supports lm ]
>
FWIW, there is already support in Syslinux to do that.
If what distros want is a single kernel image that can boot into either
mode, that might be an interesting enhancement to wraplinux.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists