linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] Gigaset driver patches for 2.6.32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1252333855.2139.15.camel@desktop>
Date:	Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:30:55 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
	Hansjoerg Lipp <hjlipp@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Gigaset driver patches for 2.6.32

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:07 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Daniel,
> 
> thanks for taking a look at my patches.
> 
> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:26:46 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > patches 6,7,10, and 12 all have checkpatch errors. Could you fix those? 
> 
> I have reissued patch 7, exchanging the "static" and "inline" keywords
> as requested.
> 
> The other patches I'd much prefer to keep as they are. The "ERRORs"
> checkpatch.pl reported for them are results of keeping to the existing
> formatting of the patched files. Completely reformatting them would
> cloud the actual changes made by the patches.

Yeah, it looks like the whole file needs a checkpatch clean up.. Sounds
like your not willing to do that? Usually if a checkpatch cleanup comes
first prior to all your other changes , it doesn't usually cloud the
rest of the changes..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/