[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909071022080.17860@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
To: Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] m32r: Move the spi_stack_top and spu_stack_top into
.data section.
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Hirokazu Takata wrote:
> From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] m32r: Move the spi_stack_top and spu_stack_top into .data section.
> Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:12:58 -0400
> > Since these get squashed into the .data output section by the m32r
> > linker script, it seems likely that they don't need their own input
> > sections.
> >
> > I'd like an explicit confirmation from Hirokazu Takata that this is
> > correct (in particular, that there isn't some hidden reason why there
> > two structures need to be at the start of the .data output section).
>
> There is no apparent reason. We've placed them at the start of .data
> section, because they are for initial stack region.
>
> I think it would be better that we place them to .init.data section.
> Any comment?
Assuming that they aren't used after the initial boot process, that's
probably the right choice.
-Tim Abbott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists