lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:33:28 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jcm@...hat.com, sdietrich@...ell.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu, Olaf.Dabrunz@....net, ktokunag@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, lenb@...nel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] boot interrupts on Intel X58 and 55x0 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Stefan Assmann wrote: > is more serious namely the onboard NIC (8086:10c9) is malfunctioning on some > of our test system if the second patch is applied. It fails to acquire an IP > from DHCP and we're pretty clueless on this issue right now. > Help is greatly appreciated! Did you read Intel documet 320839-009, August/2009, already? It is at: http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/specupdate/320839.pdf I see some stuff there that might be a problem, many of the "issues" are related to interrupt handling. Errata 40 (EOI to IOAPIC can be blocked) even states that one should avoid the X58 IOH IOAPIC on stepping B2 completely, and use the IOAPIC in the ICH10R instead. And the B2 stepping is the one in most motherboards (B3 is quite new). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists