[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA7E82B.3080203@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:38:51 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC: Beth Kon <eak@...ibm.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wierdness - linux-next KVM patch breaks Dell Latitude D820, KVM
not in kernel
On 09/09/2009 08:34 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:41:28 EDT, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu said:
>
>
>> Yeah, I was quite confused by the bisect results as well, I may end up
>> re-doing it just to make sure I didn't screw something up along the way (since
>> I started it with -rc7/HEAD as the good/bad, but most of the resulting
>> kernels reported a pre-rc7 release (a 2.6.28 at one point, IIRC, and it
>> finished at 31-rc2.
>>
> I've become convinced that Something Really Bad happened to the KVM tree in
> linux-next on its way to my laptop - after 2 bisects, it reported I had some
> 2,000 commits left to check. So I ran 'git bisect visualize' to sanity check.
>
> And *every single one* of those 4,000 commits between 'good' and 'bad' was a
> KVM commit, stretching all the way back to 2007. Unless that's an artifact
> of the way linux-next is built, I would have expected only "new-ish" commits
> to be in the bisect window, and not just out of one tree...
>
> So I ended up doing a 'WTF?', an 'rm -r', and am cloning over today's linux-next
> and will see if that brings me any better joy.
>
>
Oh, it's an artifact of kvm.git, not linux-next. I really should feed
something better to -next.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists