linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] increase rcutorture intensity and fix a couple resulting bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21629.1252518239@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:43:59 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] increase rcutorture intensity and fix a couple resulting bugs

On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:53:49 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said:
> This patch series increases the intensity of rcutorture testing for
> TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and provides fixes for a couple resulting bugs.

Minor bisection nit - should patch 1/3 be renumbered to 3/3, so the two bugfix
patches go in before the patch that makes the unpatched bugs visible? Otherwise
if a bisect waypoint happens to land on 1/3, oddness can happen...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped