[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA98AF8.7050701@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:25:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char/tty_io: fix legacy pty name when more than 256 pty
devices are requested
On 09/10/2009 04:23 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> They won't work because the glibc pty name handling only does the 256
> devices. Given glibc still hasn't picked up tty changes from several
> years ago I doubt it'll ever pick up a naming change.
>
> BSD pty is dead. It has all sorts of problems including time taken to
> find a new port being dependant on ports currently in use. The amount of
> code that cares about it is close to nil, that which cares about it uses
> glibc BSD pty helper code so won't work with > 256 anyway.
>
I don't think they use glibc helper code, or they would automatically
end up with Unix98 ptys. Rather, the remaining users of BSD ptys are
probably those where the application hard-codes the pty naming for each
platform it ran on... which is even worse of a compatibility nightmare,
of course.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists