lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:19:19 +0800 From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Cc: rpurdie@...ys.net, lenz@...wisc.edu, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dirk@...er-online.de, arminlitzel@....de, Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, utx@...guin.cz, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >> On Wed 2009-09-09 19:23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: >> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@....cz> wrote: >> > > > Hi, Linus! >> > > > >> > > > Spitz resume was broken for year or likely two, and it would be very >> > > > nice to fix it for 2.6.31 release. One liner is below, and it really >> > > > can not harm. It already is in Eric's fix queue, so pulling that for >> > > > .31 should work, too. >> > > > >> > > >> > > This should be sitting in rmk's git tree and I'm not sure if Russell >> > > has sent the pull request already. >> > >> > It's just Pavel being his obnoxious impatient self... >> >> Aha, Russell, being polite and helpful, as usual. >> >> Only that, you know, you missed the deadline, so... perhaps I had >> reason to be impatient? > > I missed the deadline because I was waiting on others to sort out telling > me whether a bugfix patch was actually correct, and then it took several > days and mails to get an attributation line out of them. I finally got > that yesterday, and since I'm not doing kernel work (in fact, I'm hardly > in front of the computer at the moment) these things are going to _HAVE_ > to wait until this weekend. > > By agreement with Linus, I do not send pull requests more often than once > a week, absolute maximum. So if I've something pending in the queue, I > hold off sending the queue until that issue is resolved. > > Don't like it? Tough. This is the workflow that I've been forced into > by other flame wars. It would be my personal preference to ensure that > fixes make their way in a timely manner into mainline, but due to that, > it's just not possible. > Pavel, It is still possible to get this into the stable release so take easy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists