linux-kernel - Re: [patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:19:19 +0800
From:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	rpurdie@...ys.net, lenz@...wisc.edu,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dirk@...er-online.de, arminlitzel@....de,
	Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, utx@...guin.cz,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Wed 2009-09-09 19:23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> > > > Hi, Linus!
>> > > >
>> > > > Spitz resume was broken for year or likely two, and it would be very
>> > > > nice to fix it for 2.6.31 release. One liner is below, and it really
>> > > > can not harm. It already is in Eric's fix queue, so pulling that for
>> > > > .31 should work, too.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > This should be sitting in rmk's git tree and I'm not sure if Russell
>> > > has sent the pull request already.
>> >
>> > It's just Pavel being his obnoxious impatient self...
>>
>> Aha, Russell, being polite and helpful, as usual.
>>
>> Only that, you know, you missed the deadline, so... perhaps I had
>> reason to be impatient?
>
> I missed the deadline because I was waiting on others to sort out telling
> me whether a bugfix patch was actually correct, and then it took several
> days and mails to get an attributation line out of them.  I finally got
> that yesterday, and since I'm not doing kernel work (in fact, I'm hardly
> in front of the computer at the moment) these things are going to _HAVE_
> to wait until this weekend.
>
> By agreement with Linus, I do not send pull requests more often than once
> a week, absolute maximum.  So if I've something pending in the queue, I
> hold off sending the queue until that issue is resolved.
>
> Don't like it?  Tough.  This is the workflow that I've been forced into
> by other flame wars.  It would be my personal preference to ensure that
> fixes make their way in a timely manner into mainline, but due to that,
> it's just not possible.
>

Pavel,

It is still possible to get this into the stable release so take easy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/