[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090915113347.GC1328@ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:33:47 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
rpurdie@...ys.net, lenz@...wisc.edu,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dirk@...er-online.de, arminlitzel@....de,
Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, utx@...guin.cz,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.31] zaurus c3000 aka spitz: fix resume
On Fri 2009-09-11 09:19:19, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Wed 2009-09-09 19:23:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >> > > > Hi, Linus!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Spitz resume was broken for year or likely two, and it would be very
> >> > > > nice to fix it for 2.6.31 release. One liner is below, and it really
> >> > > > can not harm. It already is in Eric's fix queue, so pulling that for
> >> > > > .31 should work, too.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > This should be sitting in rmk's git tree and I'm not sure if Russell
> >> > > has sent the pull request already.
> >> >
> >> > It's just Pavel being his obnoxious impatient self...
> >>
> >> Aha, Russell, being polite and helpful, as usual.
> >>
> >> Only that, you know, you missed the deadline, so... perhaps I had
> >> reason to be impatient?
> >
> > I missed the deadline because I was waiting on others to sort out telling
> > me whether a bugfix patch was actually correct, and then it took several
> > days and mails to get an attributation line out of them. ??I finally got
> > that yesterday, and since I'm not doing kernel work (in fact, I'm hardly
> > in front of the computer at the moment) these things are going to _HAVE_
> > to wait until this weekend.
> >
> > By agreement with Linus, I do not send pull requests more often than once
> > a week, absolute maximum. ??So if I've something pending in the queue, I
> > hold off sending the queue until that issue is resolved.
> >
> > Don't like it? ??Tough. ??This is the workflow that I've been forced into
> > by other flame wars. ??It would be my personal preference to ensure that
> > fixes make their way in a timely manner into mainline, but due to that,
> > it's just not possible.
> >
>
> Pavel,
>
> It is still possible to get this into the stable release so take easy.
Ok, so can you (or Russell?) add cc: stable@...nel.org header so that
stable is notified when patch is merged?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists