linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 1/7] x86/ptrace: Fix regs_get_argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1252633386.18996.60.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:43:06 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 1/7] x86/ptrace: Fix
 regs_get_argument_nth() to add correct offset

On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:53 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

> ---
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> index a33a17d..caffb68 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static const int arg_offs_table[] = {
>  unsigned long regs_get_argument_nth(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int n)
>  {
>  	if (n < ARRAY_SIZE(arg_offs_table))
> -		return *((unsigned long *)regs + arg_offs_table[n]);
> +		return *(unsigned long *)((char *)regs + arg_offs_table[n]);

That definitely looks like a bug.

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve

>  	else {
>  		/*
>  		 * The typical case: arg n is on the stack.
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/