linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] x86: Convert BUG() to use unreachable()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:42:24 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] x86: Convert BUG() to use unreachable()

On 09/10/2009 06:37 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> There are other cases where that kind of config-time testing could be 
>> useful, and we could avoid doing various gcc checks dynamically from 
>> within 'make' (along with checking for known-buggy versions etc).
> 
> I quite agree that this would be an improvement for many sorts of compiler
> feature (and other tool detail) conditionalization.

The nicest, of course, would be if gcc exported its internal support,
similar to the way it nowadays export macros for the various internal
data types.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/