linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm: FOLL_DUMP replace FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:05:01 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm: FOLL_DUMP replace FOLL_ANON

Hi, Hugh.

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:46:12 +0100 (BST)
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >        /*
> > >         * When core dumping an enormous anonymous area that nobody
> > > -        * has touched so far, we don't want to allocate page tables.
> > > +        * has touched so far, we don't want to allocate unnecessary pages or
> > > +        * page tables.  Return error instead of NULL to skip handle_mm_fault,
> > > +        * then get_dump_page() will return NULL to leave a hole in the dump.
> > > +        * But we can only make this optimization where a hole would surely
> > > +        * be zero-filled if handle_mm_fault() actually did handle it.
> > >         */
> > > -       if (flags & FOLL_ANON) {
> > > -               page = ZERO_PAGE(0);
> > > -               if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> > > -                       get_page(page);
> > > -               BUG_ON(flags & FOLL_WRITE);
> > > -       }
> > > +       if ((flags & FOLL_DUMP) &&
> > > +           (!vma->vm_ops || !vma->vm_ops->fault))
> > 
> > How about adding comment about zero page use?
> 
> What kind of comment did you have in mind?
> We used to use ZERO_PAGE there, but with this patch we're not using it.
> I thought the comment above describes what we're doing well enough.
> 
> I may have kept too quiet about ZERO_PAGEs, knowing that a later patch
> was going to change the story; but I don't see what needs saying here.

I meant following as line. 

> > > +       if ((flags & FOLL_DUMP) &&
> > > +           (!vma->vm_ops || !vma->vm_ops->fault))

Why do we care about anonymous vma and FOLL_DUMP?
Yeah, comment above mentioned page tables. 
But i think someone who first look at can't think it easily. 

If you think the comment is enough, I don't mind it. 

> Hugh


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/