[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AADB887.103@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:11 +0800
From: Danny Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC: cl@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [GIT BISECT] BUG kmalloc-8192: Object already free from kmem_cache_destroy
On 09/14/2009 11:25 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:18 +0800, Danny Feng wrote:
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index b627675..40e12d5 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -3337,8 +3337,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(const char
>> *name, size_t size,
>> goto err;
>> }
>> return s;
>> - }
>> - kfree(s);
>> + } else
>> + kfree(s);
>> }
>> up_write(&slub_lock);
>>
>
> Doesn't the return inside the conditional take care of this? I'll give
> it a try in the morning, but I don't see how this can solve the
> problem....
>
> -Eric
>
>
err, you're right... let me try to find why. It's strange, if SLUB_DEBUG
is not set, sysfs_slab_remove is just to free kmem_cache s. So I think
if SLUB_DEBUG is not set, we also have the same issue....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists