linux-kernel - Re: [origin tree SLAB corruption] BUG kmalloc-64: Poison overwritten, INFO: Allocated in bdi_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090914171037.GG14984@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:10:37 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Thomas Liu <tliu@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [origin tree SLAB corruption] BUG kmalloc-64: Poison
	overwritten, INFO: Allocated in bdi_alloc_work+0x2b/0x100 age=175
	cpu=1 pid=3514

On Mon, Sep 14 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:40:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > BUG kmalloc-64: Poison overwritten
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > INFO: 0xf498f6a0-0xf498f6a7. First byte 0x90 instead of 0x6b
> > > INFO: Allocated in bdi_alloc_work+0x2b/0x100 age=175 cpu=1 pid=3514
> > > INFO: Freed in bdi_work_free+0x45/0x60 age=9 cpu=1 pid=3509
> > > INFO: Slab 0xc3257d84 objects=36 used=11 fp=0xf498f690 flags=0x400000c3
> > > INFO: Object 0xf498f690 @offset=1680 fp=0xf498fe00
> > > 
> > > Bytes b4 0xf498f680:  ab 0d 00 00 9c 27 ff ff 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ?....'??ZZZZZZZZ
> > >   Object 0xf498f690:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > >   Object 0xf498f6a0:  90 f3 98 f4 60 3c 11 c1 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b .?.?`<.?kkkkkkkk
> > 
> > That's 8 bytes of 0xf498f398 and 0xc1113c60. Doesn't look like much, but 
> > they're both valid kernel pointers, and the 0xf498f398 one is actually 
> > into the same page as the corruption, so it's a pointer to the same slab 
> > type (or at least same size). Which is a good hint in itself: we're 
> > looking at a list or something.
> > 
> > And it's at offset 16 in the structure. 
> > 
> > That's almost certainly a "struct bdi_work", and the use-aftr-free thing 
> > is the "struct rcu_head rcu_head" part of it. That first thing (pointer to 
> > the same page) is 'next', and the second thing is a pointer to kernel text 
> > (and I can pretty much guarantee that 0xc1113c60 is 'bdi_work_free').
> > 
> > So this is either a fs/fs-writeback.c bug, or it's a problem with RCU. 
> > Both of them are new or hugely changed since 2.6.31.
> 
> If this run had used CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU rather than the
> CONFIG_TREE_RCU that it actually had used, I would suggest applying the
> patchset I submitted yesterday (Sept 13).
> 
> 	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/888803

Ingo, did it? I'll dive into this tonight, Linus' analysis and just a
general feel does point in the direction of the bdi work.

> Will take a look, regardless.

Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/