linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090914171056.GB13452@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:10:56 -0300
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
Cc:	Corentin Chary <corentincj@...aif.net>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by
 rfkill_destroy()

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I don't know about the fix for dell-laptop since it is a lot larger.

But looking at it, it seems to meet the -stable criteria as well.  However,
it looks like you're fixing two bugs there (set pointers to NULL, call
_destroy()), so it would be better to have two (smaller) patches, maybe?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/