linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909141947.22170.corentincj@iksaif.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:22 +0200
From:	Corentin Chary <corentincj@...aif.net>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy()

On Monday 14 September 2009 19:10:56 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I don't know about the fix for dell-laptop since it is a lot larger.
> 
> But looking at it, it seems to meet the -stable criteria as well.  However,
> it looks like you're fixing two bugs there (set pointers to NULL, call
> _destroy()), so it would be better to have two (smaller) patches, maybe?
> 

The dell-laptop patch is superseded by:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42705/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42699/

I didn't check patchwork before working on this patch :/

-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/