[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253013915.5506.54.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:25:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"markus.t.metzger@...il.com" <markus.t.metzger@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch, resend] x86, perf_counter, bts: optimize BTS overflow
handling
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:18 +0100, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> >> Restructure perf_counter sampling into sample creation and sample
> >> output.
> >> Prepare a single reference sample for BTS sampling and update the from
> >> and to address fields when draining the BTS buffer.
> >> Drain the entire BTS buffer between a single perf_output_begin() /
> >> perf_output_end() pair.
> >
> >Generally looks very nice, one thing though, why did you take regs out
> >of perf_sample_data, now you get to pass around one extra param..
>
>
> That is to make perf_sample_data describe the sample directly.
>
> The regs are used to create the sample; they're not needed once
> the sample has been created.
True, but I'd have been lazy and not added that extra parameter all over
the place, but sure ;-)
This is now fast enough to BTS trace the kernel too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists