linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] input/keyboard: add ADP5588 QWERTY I2C Keyboard Input device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0909150946t65c445ddo6741c2a472c1738c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:46:14 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input/keyboard: add ADP5588 QWERTY I2C Keyboard Input 
	device driver

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:26, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:19:14AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:20, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:18:39PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> +static int __devexit adp5588_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     struct adp5588_kpad *kpad = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev);
>> >> +
>> >> +     adp5588_write(client, CFG, 0);
>> >> +     free_irq(client->irq, kpad);
>> >
>> > cancel_work_sync() is missing. Could you try the updated version below?
>>
>> i dont think i have any adp5588 hardware.  Robin: do we have any in
>> Norwood ?  otherwise, it'll have to wait for Michael to get back to
>> double check.
>>
>> > BTW, maybe you shoudl convert to threaded IRQs here?
>>
>> yes, after your suggestion for the previous driver, we've been looking
>> at all our input drivers to convert to threaded IRQs.  do we need to
>> convert all of them before acceptance, or can we merge now and post an
>> updated patch after ?
>
> It really depends on the driver. If there is a race between IRQ and the
> WQ in the driver I will request you to fix it one way or another before
> accepting the driver (and quite often using threaded IRQ gets rid of the
> race). In the cases like this particular driver though I am not even
> convinced that we need threaded IRQ. The driver is not expected to
> generate lots of events rapidly so using keventd as it does now is
> probably the best solution.

i dont think there is a race here as we only use the IRQ to schedule
the WQ; we dont read/pass info between the two.

at any rate, i noticed that this driver isnt the final one.  i spent
some time cleaning it up a bit more (style, messages, dev_pm_ops), so
i'll merge your changes and mine and post another one.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/