[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253043735.30165.59.camel@dax.rpnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:42:15 +0100
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] backlight: Provide two stage registration
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 20:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:18:42PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > Could we not pass an optional pointer to a properties structure to
> > create the backlight with instead or find a better way to solve this?
>
> That'd work, but it'd involve significant refactoring of all the
> drivers - we really need to be setting max_brightness before
> device_register() is called. I suspect it'd be an even larger delta
> against mainline.
But the delta would result in more readable code rather than all that
error checking/handling. Can we see how ugly that diff turns out to be?
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Purdie
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists