linux-kernel - [PATCH 15/16] writeback: Fix bdi use after free in wb_work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253107494-20160-16-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:24:53 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	chris.mason@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/16] writeback: Fix bdi use after free in wb_work_complete()

From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>

By the time bdi_work_on_stack gets evaluated again in bdi_work_free, it
can already have been deallocated and used for something else in the
!on stack case, giving a false positive in this test and causing
corruption.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 6bca6f8..7eba732 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static void bdi_work_free(struct rcu_head *head)
 static void wb_work_complete(struct bdi_work *work)
 {
 	const enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode = work->args.sync_mode;
+	int onstack = bdi_work_on_stack(work);
 
 	/*
 	 * For allocated work, we can clear the done/seen bit right here.
@@ -120,9 +121,9 @@ static void wb_work_complete(struct bdi_work *work)
 	 * to after the RCU grace period, since the stack could be invalidated
 	 * as soon as bdi_work_clear() has done the wakeup.
 	 */
-	if (!bdi_work_on_stack(work))
+	if (!onstack)
 		bdi_work_clear(work);
-	if (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE || bdi_work_on_stack(work))
+	if (sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE || onstack)
 		call_rcu(&work->rcu_head, bdi_work_free);
 }
 
-- 
1.6.4.1.207.g68ea

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/