linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sparc: Clean up linker script using new linker script macros.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090916.153221.257687176.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tabbott@...lice.com
Cc:	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sam@...nborg.org, geofft@...lice.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sparc: Clean up linker script using new linker
 script macros.

From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:03:48 -0400 (EDT)

> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, David Miller wrote:
> 
>> It's hard for me to ACK this because it's not a straight nop
>> transformation, which we could at least presume would function
>> properly if the macros were implemented correctly.
> 
> Would it help if I were to split the patch into first rearranging the code 
> to look like the macros and then applying the macros, so that you can see 
> more easily exactly what is changing?

No, it wouldn't :-)  The issue is that I can't just say from
reading the patch that it will absolutely work.

But I'm willing to take the risk and we can revert if testing
shows it breaks things, so:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/