[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090917.170156.152594715.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: JBeulich@...ell.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BUILD_BUG_ON() and a couple of bogus uses of it
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:24:37 -0700
> sparc64:
>
> In file included from arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c:17:
> /usr/src/devel/arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h: In function `vio_dring_avail':
> /usr/src/devel/arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h:261: error: bit-field `<anonymous>' width not an integer constant
>
> static inline u32 vio_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr,
> unsigned int ring_size)
> {
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(ring_size));
>
> return (dr->pending -
> ((dr->prod - dr->cons) & (ring_size - 1)));
> }
>
> changing it to MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON seems to have fixed it.
That's completely bogus.
First of all, arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c never calls this function
so it should never be evaluated.
Second of all, all the places that do call this function only
pass pure constants as the 'ring_size' parameter.
drivers/block/sunvdc.c:
static inline u32 vdc_tx_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr)
{
return vio_dring_avail(dr, VDC_TX_RING_SIZE);
}
drivers/net/sunvnet.c:
static inline u32 vnet_tx_dring_avail(struct vio_dring_state *dr)
{
return vio_dring_avail(dr, VNET_TX_RING_SIZE);
}
Making this MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON shouldn't be necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists