[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090918115053.GK9930@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:50:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify
* Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote:
> > But yeah, I currently don't see a very nice match to perf counters.
>
> OK. It would be nice to tie into something more general, but I think
> I agree -- perf counters are missing the filtering and the "no lost
> events" that ummunotify does have. And I'm not sure it's worth
> messing up the perf counters design just to jam one more not totally
> related thing in.
The filtering can be done and has been done - see Li Zefan's patchset
that uses filter expressions to do per event in-kernel filtering.
The OOM DoS is a bug in your patches i think, which perfcounters solves
;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists