lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090918115053.GK9930@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:50:53 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify


* Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote:

>  > But yeah, I currently don't see a very nice match to perf counters.
> 
> OK.  It would be nice to tie into something more general, but I think 
> I agree -- perf counters are missing the filtering and the "no lost 
> events" that ummunotify does have.  And I'm not sure it's worth 
> messing up the perf counters design just to jam one more not totally 
> related thing in.

The filtering can be done and has been done - see Li Zefan's patchset 
that uses filter expressions to do per event in-kernel filtering.

The OOM DoS is a bug in your patches i think, which perfcounters solves 
;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ