[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909180754.05817.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:54:05 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...neweb.ne.jp>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tun: Return -EINVAL if neither IFF_TUN nor IFF_TAP is set.
On Thursday 17 September 2009 03:36:13 am Kusanagi Kouichi wrote:
> After commit 2b980dbd77d229eb60588802162c9659726b11f4
> ("lsm: Add hooks to the TUN driver") tun_set_iff doesn't
> return -EINVAL though neither IFF_TUN nor IFF_TAP is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...neweb.ne.jp>
Sorry about that, my mistake, thanks for finding and fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 3f5d288..e091756 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -946,8 +946,6 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file
> *file, struct ifreq *ifr) char *name;
> unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> - err = -EINVAL;
> -
> if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
> err = security_tun_dev_create();
> @@ -964,7 +962,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file
> *file, struct ifreq *ifr) flags |= TUN_TAP_DEV;
> name = "tap%d";
> } else
> - goto failed;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> if (*ifr->ifr_name)
> name = ifr->ifr_name;
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists