[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090917171810.f675c8f2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:18:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net, JBeulich@...ell.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BUILD_BUG_ON() and a couple of bogus uses of it
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:15:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> There's a shortcoming in the current BUILD_BUG_ON() - it silently does
> nothing if passed a non-constant arg.
>
> I suspect that in the 2.6.31 code, that BUILD_BUG_ON() just does
> nothing at all, and that Jan's patch is now exposing this. It might be
> compiler-version dependent too.
>
>
> <tests it>
>
> Yup, on base 2.6.31, this:
>
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c~a
> +++ a/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ static const struct vio_device_id *vio_m
> const char *type, *compat;
> int len;
>
> + vio_dring_avail(NULL, 33);
> +
> type = dev->type;
> compat = dev->compat;
> len = dev->compat_len;
> _
>
> compiles without error with gcc-3.4.5.
And I can't immediately find a way to make any compile-time error occur here, with
or without Jan's patch. hm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists