linux-kernel - Re: Poor desktop responsiveness with background I/O-operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909192211.17381.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca>
Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:11:17 -0600
From:	Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@...w.ca>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor desktop responsiveness with background I/O-operations

On Sat September 19 2009, Ulrich Lukas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> using a recent hard-/software setup, I observed that continuous
> read/write operations severely degrade the overall system responsiveness
> in typical desktop-PC use cases.
> 
> Merely doing write/read operations on a data volume leads to stuck text
> and mouse cursors, seconds-long delays for simple window-context
> switches in X11, dropouts in low-resolution video playback etc.
> 
> 
> 
> Test case:
> - 64-bit dual-core PC, SATA harddrive, plenty of free RAM
> - vanilla Linux 2.6.31, Kubuntu 9.10 packages, all software 64-bit
> 
> 
> How to reproduce:
> - start KDE/GNOME-session
> - open a terminal window and do as a non-root user:
>   dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/john-doe/testfile
>   (or dd if=/home/john-doe/big-testfile of=/dev/null)
> 
> - a real use scenario would be a daily disk-backup or the
>   simple extraction of a tarball containing slightly bigger files
> 
> 
> Observation:
> - The system becomes _really_ slow as described above; unusable for
>   any multimedia tasks.
> 
> - Using an encrypted (dm-crypt/LUKS) /home (e.g. on mobile computers)
>   compounds the issue to a painful extent.
> 
> 
> 
> Possible culprits (I'm guessing) are the Linux I/O- or CPU scheduler.
> 
> I realize that a single heavyweight transfer slows down I/O for the
> corresponding transactions/processes/volumes etc.
> 
> But there needs to be a fair distribution of I/O or CPU time which
> leaves enough for other basic operations. And this doesn't seem to be
> the case with recent Linux versions.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On a side note, I've tried the BFS-patches (bfs-221 on 2.6.31): This
> yields significantly higher throughput when using disk encryption (50%
> improvement with dm-crypt/LUKS, 512 bit aes-xts-plain cipher mode). But
> with these patches, the responsiveness was even worse during my quick
> test. Switching to a text-mode console: several /minutes/ delay...
> 
> 
> I'm attaching my .config for linux 2.6.31 (grep ^C and bzip2-ed)
> 

I've seen similar things with my Intel p35 (q6600) system, especially under 
64bit. Heavy i/o makes the rest of the system perform very badly. I have 
however not noticed nearly as much of a problem with my AMD (SB700&SB750) 
systems.

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@...w.ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/