linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: Introduce ARM_L1_CACHE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc557aab0909210419x795d407erfc07ad0f4550ed88@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:19:57 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bityutskiy Artem <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
	Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: Introduce ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT to define cache 
	line size

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:48:30PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> Currently kernel believes that all ARM CPUs have L1_CACHE_SHIFT == 5.
>> It's not true at least for CPUs based on Cortex-A8.
>
> Please send this to the patch system.  There's no need to add the "V2"
> comments to it when you do.
>

#5716, #5717

BTW, I ,my pathes without change log in your git tree. Commits 910a17e
and dca230f. What is wrong with it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/