linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090921.101021.193734103.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses

From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200

> 
> based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets x86 stay
> with regular allocations.
> 
> While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around, I see no
> other way to please both sides.

If you guys want to maintain two implementations of the same thing,
that's fine with me :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/